Skip to content
Nix Trades

7. Continuation Framework

5 min read

Maintained by Nix Young

7.1 Core Continuation Conditions

Section titled “7.1 Core Continuation Conditions”
Community insights

Continuation is more suitable in the following context:

  • Trend is clear.
  • Consolidation appears.
  • Daily high / low has already formed.
  • Price respects gaps.
  • Price manipulates internal swings.
  • SMT / SS supports the original direction.
  • Gap retest appears.

Continuation usually does not require SMT as strong as reversal does. In recent gaps, 1-stage SMT is often enough.

7.2 Continuation Entry

Section titled “7.2 Continuation Entry”
Community insight
  • Highs and lows sit above every other PDA in importance: a fair value gap, order block, or rejection block only becomes high-probability once it forms off a stop run of a high or low, but a high/low itself can be traded standalone (a turtle soup) with no other PDA needed. Once a range is established, a continuation trade only needs a swing high/low forming and then getting run — no fair value gap, order block, or breaker required to justify the entry. — MMXM Trader — Continuation Purges, 0:20

Continuation setup:

  • Universal sequence;
  • 15m+ gap retest;
  • early continuation can use 15m+;
  • late continuation prefers 30m+;
  • if C2 has already expanded, do not trade C3;
  • do not trade C4+ candle.

Two continuation sequences:

  1. Retrace into FVG;
  2. Order-pairing range.

7.3 Continuation Invalidation

Section titled “7.3 Continuation Invalidation”
Community insights
  • Continuation invalidation works by moving the goalpost: mark EQ of the previous candle's range, demand a swing point and expansion away from whatever key level sits near the new open, and that expansion becomes the next invalidation level. — Garrett — "GxT Invalidations | Continuations", 0:47
  • Candle 3 should stay within the upper half (EQ) of candle 2's range. A deep retracement past that equilibrium invalidates candle 3 as the continuation candle — wait for candle 4 to respect the same equilibrium instead. — Afyz — "Master Class Part 2: Continuations", 7:29
  • If price only consolidates at a refined key level instead of reversing outright, that doesn't void the trade idea — the resulting consolidation itself can become the new key level, as long as EQ of the prior range still holds. — Anomaly — Livestreams — Full Chart Process, July 5, 2026, 15:47
  • If the very candle that gives continuation confirmation (closing back through the opposing-colour candles) also sweeps a short-term high/low on the other side at the same moment, treat that dual signature as a warning rather than a green light — it often seeds a fresh reversal that runs the stop before the 'confirmed' move develops. Demand one further clean candle after the sweep resolves before trusting it. — TTrades — "Why Your Continuations Fail (Order Blocks + CISD Explained)", 2:12
  • Mark EQ of the previous candle’s range and look for a key level, such as a FVG, order block, or relevant swing, close to the new candle’s opening price.
  • Demand a swing point from that key level, then require expansion away from it. That expansion creates the next invalidation level, effectively moving the goalpost forward.
  • If price fails to expand away, give it one more chance at the next relevant swing in close proximity. If that also fails, the continuation idea is invalidated.
  • Candle 3 should itself stay in respect of the upper half (EQ) of candle 2’s range. A deep retracement of candle 3 past that equilibrium invalidates it as the continuation candle — wait instead for candle 4 to open, respect that same equilibrium, and expand from there.
  • When continuation would require trading through a relevant swing (not just a failure swing), do not pattern-trade straight through it. Confirm a genuine new PoP at that swing first — a consolidation or retracement signature, not a V-shaped reversal — before trusting continuation beyond it.

7.4 Judging Continuation Quality

Section titled “7.4 Judging Continuation Quality”
Community insights
  • Around any open draw there are three trade types: the reversal (catching the key level itself), the continuation (trading a retracement back towards an already-established draw), and the lagging-asset trade. Continuation is generally the easiest, since the draw and direction are already established. — Erik — "Trading with an Open Draw" lecture, 3:37
  • If the first half of an hourly candle expands aggressively towards the draw, expect the second half to complete it. If the first half only consolidates, the candle is waiting on the higher timeframe to close and form a fresh gap instead. — Erik — "Trading with an Open Draw" lecture, 12:13
  • When a 30-minute SMT fill fails to deliver, don't scrap the idea — wait for the hourly to close and form its own gap; if that fails too, wait for the 90-minute; escalate one timeframe at a time until one actually delivers. — Erik — "gap continuations" mini-lecture, 1:00
  • After an SMT or gap fill, demand immediate expansion away from it. If price instead consolidates or only makes a shallow retracement right after the SMT, that is a low-probability signature — it does not confirm the continuation on its own, even if price does eventually go the right way. Wait for either a re-sweep or a higher-timeframe close to re-confirm before trusting it.
  • Intra-candle fractal alignment predicts whether a candle will complete its objective: if the first half of an hourly candle (its first 30 minutes, for a 30/60 alignment) expands aggressively towards the draw, expect the second half to continue and complete it. If the first half only consolidates without expanding, the candle is effectively waiting on the higher timeframe — expect it to close, form a fresh gap, and continue from there instead.
  • The three trade types available around an open draw are the reversal (catching the key level itself), the continuation (trading the retracement back towards an already-established draw), and the lagging-asset trade (trading a weaker asset to catch up once it shows a strength switch). Continuation is generally the easiest of the three, since the draw and direction are already established — you are trading into it, not trying to catch it.
  • When an SMT fill fails to deliver on the timeframe it formed on, escalate one timeframe at a time rather than abandoning the idea: wait for that candle to close and the next timeframe up to form its own gap (for example 30m fill fails → wait for the 1h gap; 1h fill fails → wait for the 90m gap; 90m fill fails → wait for the 4h gap). Trade the CiSD that forms right after whichever timeframe actually delivers, and only scrap the idea once you run out of higher timeframes to escalate to.

7.5 Trading Against an Existing Gap

Section titled “7.5 Trading Against an Existing Gap”
Community insight
  • Never trade directly against a gap unless you can manage the trade right at that gap (partial, break-even, or full TP) — you cannot assume price continues through it. The only thing that truly invalidates a gap is a fresh gap forming in the opposite direction. — Erik — "invalidations" mini-lecture, 29:40
  • A gap is itself an expansion signature in its own direction. Don’t fade a move that has an un-negated gap supporting the opposing direction — PoP can’t go straight from one expansion into an opposing expansion; it has to retrace, consolidate, or produce a genuine reversal (an AMD reversal, or a fresh gap in the opposing direction) first.
  • A gap in the opposing direction is what invalidates — “counteracts” — an existing gap. Once that opposing gap forms, the original gap’s directional bias no longer holds and the new direction can be traded.
  • If you do trade directly against an existing gap anyway, treat that gap itself as your management point: partial, move to break-even, or take full profit as soon as price reaches it, since you cannot assume price will continue through it.
  • Treat a gap as a level you use only once. Once price has tapped it and expanded away, don’t keep treating it as ongoing support or resistance — it behaves like a low-timeframe swing that has already been used.
  • A continuation sequence doesn’t require a gap on every correlated asset. As long as at least one asset shows the confirming gap/SMT-fill, the trade can be executed on a different asset toward the same draw — provided that asset isn’t itself the weakest or wrong-positioned one in the group.

Personal study notes, shared as-is and in good faith. Educational material only — nothing on this site constitutes financial advice.